Developing Instructional Leaders: Using Mixed Methods to Explore the Black Box of Planned Change in Principals
Using a variety of innovative data collection strategies such as latent class analyses of daily log data, qualitative typology development, and case studies of change, the study provides a rich portrait of the learning and change process.
For a copy of this article by Carol A. Barnes, Eric Camburn, Beth R. Sanders, and James Sebastian, please visit Educational Administrator Quarterly (2010, 46, 241–279).
The research for this study was conducted under the auspices of CPRE and supported through a grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences.
More Like This
- Meeting Papers
- Mixed Methods in Randomized Trials: Realizing the Potential, Avoiding the Pitt-falls
- Assessing the Utility of a Daily Log for Measuring Principal Leadership Practice
- Lessons Learned from an Experimental Evaluation of a Principal Professional Development Program
- Measuring Principal Practice: Results from Two Promising Measurement Strategies
- How Principals Influence Program Outcomes: The Challenges of Implementing A Demanding Development Program for Instructional Leaders
- Using Evidence for School Improvement: State Education Agencies in the 21st Century
- Books & Book Chapters
